<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Email Lists That Don&#8217;t Self-Destruct In 5 Minutes</title>
	<atom:link href="http://finchsells.com/2010/01/31/email-lists-that-dont-self-destruct-in-5-minutes/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://finchsells.com/2010/01/31/email-lists-that-dont-self-destruct-in-5-minutes/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Sep 2010 14:24:16 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shane</title>
		<link>http://finchsells.com/2010/01/31/email-lists-that-dont-self-destruct-in-5-minutes/comment-page-1/#comment-15523</link>
		<dc:creator>Shane</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Feb 2010 22:46:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://finchsells.com/?p=659#comment-15523</guid>
		<description>Hope you enjoyed your break. Not answering mail for a bit can be a real blessing. (also shitty when you need to catch up afterwards, though)

Very interesting idea about going with small, local lists. I had never considered that myself.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hope you enjoyed your break. Not answering mail for a bit can be a real blessing. (also shitty when you need to catch up afterwards, though)</p>
<p>Very interesting idea about going with small, local lists. I had never considered that myself.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: andrew wee</title>
		<link>http://finchsells.com/2010/01/31/email-lists-that-dont-self-destruct-in-5-minutes/comment-page-1/#comment-15496</link>
		<dc:creator>andrew wee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Feb 2010 02:01:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://finchsells.com/?p=659#comment-15496</guid>
		<description>one thing that&#039;s useful when doing emailing is to solicit questions from your readers. Besides encouraging interactivity (and possibly reducing &quot;Report as spam&quot; clicks), I&#039;ve read that there&#039;s an email metric that measures 2-way communication, as wholly unidirectional communication (you to list) is one of the flags for spam (who replies to a viagra ad anyway...).

my 2 pence.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>one thing that&#8217;s useful when doing emailing is to solicit questions from your readers. Besides encouraging interactivity (and possibly reducing &#8220;Report as spam&#8221; clicks), I&#8217;ve read that there&#8217;s an email metric that measures 2-way communication, as wholly unidirectional communication (you to list) is one of the flags for spam (who replies to a viagra ad anyway&#8230;).</p>
<p>my 2 pence.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom &#124; Build That List</title>
		<link>http://finchsells.com/2010/01/31/email-lists-that-dont-self-destruct-in-5-minutes/comment-page-1/#comment-15492</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom &#124; Build That List</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 31 Jan 2010 20:33:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://finchsells.com/?p=659#comment-15492</guid>
		<description>I love how you mention that we need to go for maximum relevance. If we are not focusing on solving our list members problems, then there is going to be a good chance that we will get marked as spam.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I love how you mention that we need to go for maximum relevance. If we are not focusing on solving our list members problems, then there is going to be a good chance that we will get marked as spam.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
