<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Finch Sells</title>
	<atom:link href="http://finchsells.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://finchsells.com</link>
	<description>UK Affiliate Marketing Blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 05 May 2012 11:56:12 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.5</generator>
<meta xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex,follow" />
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Cloaking On Facebook &#8211; Is It Really Worth It? by Graham Nichols</title>
		<link>http://finchsells.com/2012/04/10/cloaking-on-facebook-is-it-really-worth-it/comment-page-1/#comment-53174</link>
		<dc:creator>Graham Nichols</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 May 2012 11:56:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://finchsells.com/?p=3737#comment-53174</guid>
		<description>I wonder if it&#039;s possible to place an affiliate ad on fb for the fbscriptsensei cloaker? 

Go on ... you know you want to. Just lie back and think of the kudos, as the sun glints off the bars in your window.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wonder if it&#8217;s possible to place an affiliate ad on fb for the fbscriptsensei cloaker? </p>
<p>Go on &#8230; you know you want to. Just lie back and think of the kudos, as the sun glints off the bars in your window.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Cloaking On Facebook &#8211; Is It Really Worth It? by Graham Nichols</title>
		<link>http://finchsells.com/2012/04/10/cloaking-on-facebook-is-it-really-worth-it/comment-page-1/#comment-53172</link>
		<dc:creator>Graham Nichols</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 May 2012 11:49:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://finchsells.com/?p=3737#comment-53172</guid>
		<description>The process of cloaking can be damaging to all affiliates. It can lead to advertising platforms banning any form of redirection, negating an affiliate&#039;s ability to utilise a tracker in his/her clickpath.

As we all rely heavily on accurate data for split testing and trending, we really don&#039;t want this to happen across the media-buying board.

Cloaking ain&#039;t for me.

I agree with Finch. Having to rely on shady tactics to bank, indicates a very flakey business model.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The process of cloaking can be damaging to all affiliates. It can lead to advertising platforms banning any form of redirection, negating an affiliate&#8217;s ability to utilise a tracker in his/her clickpath.</p>
<p>As we all rely heavily on accurate data for split testing and trending, we really don&#8217;t want this to happen across the media-buying board.</p>
<p>Cloaking ain&#8217;t for me.</p>
<p>I agree with Finch. Having to rely on shady tactics to bank, indicates a very flakey business model.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on 0% of Affiliate Marketers Are Female by Nic</title>
		<link>http://finchsells.com/2012/02/22/0-of-affiliate-marketers-are-female/comment-page-1/#comment-53106</link>
		<dc:creator>Nic</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 May 2012 23:21:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://finchsells.com/?p=3509#comment-53106</guid>
		<description>As for the comment about there being more men in technical roles - did you ever think it&#039;s because women don&#039;t have the opportunities to enter these fields that men do? From the time they&#039;re little, they&#039;re encouraged to enter more humanities and service-based industries. And the women who do go into technical fields find it hard to advance because it&#039;s a boys party. The same thing goes for CPA. Luckily things are (slowly) changing for the better.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As for the comment about there being more men in technical roles &#8211; did you ever think it&#8217;s because women don&#8217;t have the opportunities to enter these fields that men do? From the time they&#8217;re little, they&#8217;re encouraged to enter more humanities and service-based industries. And the women who do go into technical fields find it hard to advance because it&#8217;s a boys party. The same thing goes for CPA. Luckily things are (slowly) changing for the better.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on AuthorRank: Should Affiliates Be Worried? by tanim</title>
		<link>http://finchsells.com/2012/04/24/authorrank-should-affiliates-be-worried/comment-page-1/#comment-53048</link>
		<dc:creator>tanim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 May 2012 03:39:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://finchsells.com/?p=3773#comment-53048</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m currently linking to fake profiles and it&#039;s not that bad. For example - in a dieting niche, the name would be diet + a common first name like &quot;Diet John&quot; etc. People won&#039;t suspect anything unless you are selling something to them directly.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m currently linking to fake profiles and it&#8217;s not that bad. For example &#8211; in a dieting niche, the name would be diet + a common first name like &#8220;Diet John&#8221; etc. People won&#8217;t suspect anything unless you are selling something to them directly.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on AuthorRank: Should Affiliates Be Worried? by Still Right</title>
		<link>http://finchsells.com/2012/04/24/authorrank-should-affiliates-be-worried/comment-page-1/#comment-52809</link>
		<dc:creator>Still Right</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Apr 2012 03:34:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://finchsells.com/?p=3773#comment-52809</guid>
		<description>1.) I&#039;m a huge fan of being open and transparent, it makes life easier and of course, money flows through increased competition and market saturation.

2.) I also believe that this new iteration of &quot;accuracy via identity&quot;, the point where competitive analysis and socialism diverge, is for the greater good. We as a collective (meaning everyone in the world) need to be held accountable and validated through algorithms to the point where we essentially become a &quot;trusted&quot; source or a &quot;potential fraud&quot;. Of course, I&#039;m very happy to share my newest ventures with anyone that&#039;s interested.

Both are lies. What is this &quot;web Social Security Number 2.0&quot;?

If you&#039;re an affiliate, you stay low - nothing to gain from exposure. Do you own a product? Yes? Then you&#039;re not an affiliate, shut it.  If you&#039;re a PR chasing shit bag with legit sites - have it cowboy, I hope you aren&#039;t pushing affiliate offers and depend on that income. 

On second thought. I&#039;m all for this.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>1.) I&#8217;m a huge fan of being open and transparent, it makes life easier and of course, money flows through increased competition and market saturation.</p>
<p>2.) I also believe that this new iteration of &#8220;accuracy via identity&#8221;, the point where competitive analysis and socialism diverge, is for the greater good. We as a collective (meaning everyone in the world) need to be held accountable and validated through algorithms to the point where we essentially become a &#8220;trusted&#8221; source or a &#8220;potential fraud&#8221;. Of course, I&#8217;m very happy to share my newest ventures with anyone that&#8217;s interested.</p>
<p>Both are lies. What is this &#8220;web Social Security Number 2.0&#8243;?</p>
<p>If you&#8217;re an affiliate, you stay low &#8211; nothing to gain from exposure. Do you own a product? Yes? Then you&#8217;re not an affiliate, shut it.  If you&#8217;re a PR chasing shit bag with legit sites &#8211; have it cowboy, I hope you aren&#8217;t pushing affiliate offers and depend on that income. </p>
<p>On second thought. I&#8217;m all for this.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on AuthorRank: Should Affiliates Be Worried? by Angry Russian</title>
		<link>http://finchsells.com/2012/04/24/authorrank-should-affiliates-be-worried/comment-page-1/#comment-52780</link>
		<dc:creator>Angry Russian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Apr 2012 14:30:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://finchsells.com/?p=3773#comment-52780</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t think this is a totally new concept, in publishing people have used &quot;pen names&quot; for years to mask their true identities. 

This has been one of the biggest downfalls of the social web IMO... the inability to create multiple identities. Who I am to my parents, my school friends, my business friends are very different people. I don&#039;t have the time or patience to &quot;sort&quot; all those connections using complex privacy controls and grouping is ineffective and a waste of time. 

With creating a &quot;pen name&quot; for your sketchier projects will be difficult if you want that identity to be robust since creating that separation in todays social landscape is a pain. 

Maybe hire someone to do it full time?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t think this is a totally new concept, in publishing people have used &#8220;pen names&#8221; for years to mask their true identities. </p>
<p>This has been one of the biggest downfalls of the social web IMO&#8230; the inability to create multiple identities. Who I am to my parents, my school friends, my business friends are very different people. I don&#8217;t have the time or patience to &#8220;sort&#8221; all those connections using complex privacy controls and grouping is ineffective and a waste of time. </p>
<p>With creating a &#8220;pen name&#8221; for your sketchier projects will be difficult if you want that identity to be robust since creating that separation in todays social landscape is a pain. </p>
<p>Maybe hire someone to do it full time?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on AuthorRank: Should Affiliates Be Worried? by Jim Spartan</title>
		<link>http://finchsells.com/2012/04/24/authorrank-should-affiliates-be-worried/comment-page-1/#comment-52777</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim Spartan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Apr 2012 14:07:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://finchsells.com/?p=3773#comment-52777</guid>
		<description>What if you &quot;branded&quot; a pseudo that was used in the more sketchy endeavors keeping &quot;Finch&quot; all sparkly clean.  Then when needed give &quot;Sketchy&quot; juice from content written by Finch from separate domains. Wouldn&#039;t this transfer authority to Sketchy while keeping Finch invited back to the dinner table?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What if you &#8220;branded&#8221; a pseudo that was used in the more sketchy endeavors keeping &#8220;Finch&#8221; all sparkly clean.  Then when needed give &#8220;Sketchy&#8221; juice from content written by Finch from separate domains. Wouldn&#8217;t this transfer authority to Sketchy while keeping Finch invited back to the dinner table?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on CPA Marketers: Read This And Improve Your Conversion Rates by Still Right</title>
		<link>http://finchsells.com/2012/04/17/cpa-marketers-read-this-and-improve-your-conversion-rates/comment-page-1/#comment-52737</link>
		<dc:creator>Still Right</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Apr 2012 02:32:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://finchsells.com/?p=3772#comment-52737</guid>
		<description>@smutmoney - one of these days I may reveal myself and reach out to Finch and say &quot;Dude, I&#039;m sorry for constantly bashing on you&quot; - but now is not that time.

Here&#039;s what I&#039;ll give Ryan, he&#039;s hustling. And by hustling, I don&#039;t mean in the retarded inner-city rapper way that you pretend to work for a living while writing poor lyrics about shit you never did and hoping to live off your meager record advance for the rest of your life, I&#039;m saying, he actually puts in time to achieve a goal. Is it mostly ego and selfish? Sure. No different than us. Does it mean his network rocks? No, quite the opposite. Do I like him? Honestly, he&#039;s a nice enough guy, especially in the industry of networks that don&#039;t play ball. He DOES respond to emails, and if he can&#039;t help, he points you in the right direction. Does that mean I get fucking paid on time? Not so much. Does that mean I get top tier rev share? No, you go direct for that. He does however try, and that&#039;s more than I can say for many AM&#039;s that take a week to respond, and push the same stale email submits like they actually fucking deliver ROI for anyone not running a torrent site.

First and foremost, remember you&#039;re dealing with a marketer running a network. He&#039;s the Tony Fucking Robbins of network owners, but you can&#039;t knock him for putting on a show. One of these days, probably when he turns 25 or so, he&#039;ll realize a show, and the subsequent product/service that follows, must have enough substance to stand on its own. You can push shady shit for only so long before you get burned by an advertiser that&#039;s unable to pay - #networkimplodes and advertisers revolt and very few network owners are working towards a &quot;long money&quot; solution - including him. It&#039;s more a &quot;state of the industry&quot; problem than greed, if you get that. 

I respect him as a marketer, and &quot;drive&quot; should be respected by everyone (unless you&#039;re talking about the movie). My hope, really. Is that more of the networks start making pushes to follow a similar style. &quot;Do more, do better&quot;, whatever the fuck it is he&#039;s preaching, because that&#039;s at the core of what we all need - competition, equality and stability. I think he&#039;s truly trying, and I can tell you networks like CJ truly aren&#039;t. 

You know, now that I think about it. Maybe we should just start bagging on all the so-called &quot;super affiliate&quot; bloggers out there. It&#039;s laughable. &quot;Hi, I&#039;m 23, I&#039;ve made millions on rebills, now I&#039;m selling a book&quot;...is it titled &quot;I quit when shit got hard&quot;? cause that&#039;s what it sounds like.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@smutmoney &#8211; one of these days I may reveal myself and reach out to Finch and say &#8220;Dude, I&#8217;m sorry for constantly bashing on you&#8221; &#8211; but now is not that time.</p>
<p>Here&#8217;s what I&#8217;ll give Ryan, he&#8217;s hustling. And by hustling, I don&#8217;t mean in the retarded inner-city rapper way that you pretend to work for a living while writing poor lyrics about shit you never did and hoping to live off your meager record advance for the rest of your life, I&#8217;m saying, he actually puts in time to achieve a goal. Is it mostly ego and selfish? Sure. No different than us. Does it mean his network rocks? No, quite the opposite. Do I like him? Honestly, he&#8217;s a nice enough guy, especially in the industry of networks that don&#8217;t play ball. He DOES respond to emails, and if he can&#8217;t help, he points you in the right direction. Does that mean I get fucking paid on time? Not so much. Does that mean I get top tier rev share? No, you go direct for that. He does however try, and that&#8217;s more than I can say for many AM&#8217;s that take a week to respond, and push the same stale email submits like they actually fucking deliver ROI for anyone not running a torrent site.</p>
<p>First and foremost, remember you&#8217;re dealing with a marketer running a network. He&#8217;s the Tony Fucking Robbins of network owners, but you can&#8217;t knock him for putting on a show. One of these days, probably when he turns 25 or so, he&#8217;ll realize a show, and the subsequent product/service that follows, must have enough substance to stand on its own. You can push shady shit for only so long before you get burned by an advertiser that&#8217;s unable to pay &#8211; #networkimplodes and advertisers revolt and very few network owners are working towards a &#8220;long money&#8221; solution &#8211; including him. It&#8217;s more a &#8220;state of the industry&#8221; problem than greed, if you get that. </p>
<p>I respect him as a marketer, and &#8220;drive&#8221; should be respected by everyone (unless you&#8217;re talking about the movie). My hope, really. Is that more of the networks start making pushes to follow a similar style. &#8220;Do more, do better&#8221;, whatever the fuck it is he&#8217;s preaching, because that&#8217;s at the core of what we all need &#8211; competition, equality and stability. I think he&#8217;s truly trying, and I can tell you networks like CJ truly aren&#8217;t. </p>
<p>You know, now that I think about it. Maybe we should just start bagging on all the so-called &#8220;super affiliate&#8221; bloggers out there. It&#8217;s laughable. &#8220;Hi, I&#8217;m 23, I&#8217;ve made millions on rebills, now I&#8217;m selling a book&#8221;&#8230;is it titled &#8220;I quit when shit got hard&#8221;? cause that&#8217;s what it sounds like.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on CPA Marketers: Read This And Improve Your Conversion Rates by smutmoney</title>
		<link>http://finchsells.com/2012/04/17/cpa-marketers-read-this-and-improve-your-conversion-rates/comment-page-1/#comment-52535</link>
		<dc:creator>smutmoney</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Apr 2012 17:52:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://finchsells.com/?p=3772#comment-52535</guid>
		<description>@Still right. I don&#039;t know who you are talking about EWA like that....But I love you. Every point you made is right on point. Funny thing is they&#039;re one of the few networks that constantly advertise &quot;WEEKLIES FOR EVERYONE!&quot; yet I know a handful of affiliates (no longer running with them) that went 4-6 weeks over the last few months to get payment. Sure Ryan is a great Network owner but the network sucks ass. It&#039;s propaganda at its finest with their martyr affiliates and Facebook group BS. 

EWA is also another network that encourages and even provides a resource to buy and use a cloaker. Way to go! But I won&#039;t run with a network that does that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Still right. I don&#8217;t know who you are talking about EWA like that&#8230;.But I love you. Every point you made is right on point. Funny thing is they&#8217;re one of the few networks that constantly advertise &#8220;WEEKLIES FOR EVERYONE!&#8221; yet I know a handful of affiliates (no longer running with them) that went 4-6 weeks over the last few months to get payment. Sure Ryan is a great Network owner but the network sucks ass. It&#8217;s propaganda at its finest with their martyr affiliates and Facebook group BS. </p>
<p>EWA is also another network that encourages and even provides a resource to buy and use a cloaker. Way to go! But I won&#8217;t run with a network that does that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on CPA Marketers: Read This And Improve Your Conversion Rates by Still Right</title>
		<link>http://finchsells.com/2012/04/17/cpa-marketers-read-this-and-improve-your-conversion-rates/comment-page-1/#comment-52494</link>
		<dc:creator>Still Right</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Apr 2012 02:43:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://finchsells.com/?p=3772#comment-52494</guid>
		<description>Not sure what &quot;aka Zig&quot; means, but ya AR, I agree MANY networks preach the short game, because being an affiliate in this climate is short by nature (thank you, fraud, small-time offers, and advertisers hiring people like us). 

In Finchy&#039;s defense, he did just write an anti-cloaking post recently that more people should read - as much as I hate to admit that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not sure what &#8220;aka Zig&#8221; means, but ya AR, I agree MANY networks preach the short game, because being an affiliate in this climate is short by nature (thank you, fraud, small-time offers, and advertisers hiring people like us). </p>
<p>In Finchy&#8217;s defense, he did just write an anti-cloaking post recently that more people should read &#8211; as much as I hate to admit that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

