Click Here

3 Brand Enhancing Tricks That Spike Conversions

Here’s a short guest post by Rich Gorman. You may be familiar with Rich from his marketing blog over at Direct Response. If you’re not familiar, check it out and add it to your reader. Regular quality content, ahoy.

When running media buys, around 15-25% of your traffic will Google your offer. These “due diligence” consumers search for an extra layer of validation due to their suspicious nature. Hence you want to make sure what they find is nothing but RAVING REVIEWS about the offer you’re promoting.

Here’s 3 tricks to owning page 1 of SERP results for your brands SERPs. By controlling the message, and listening to Finch’s tricks to affiliate marketing, you’ll see a significantly higher ROI on your buys:

1. Press Releases
Put out national press releases focusing on the exact match keyword in the title and strategically spread out throughout the body. Relate this news wire with something that’s important in your industry and try to tie it into national news.

i.e. I got a release listed on MSNBC last week, hence when people Google “Reputation Changer” they will see our reputation management brand has a listing from MSNBC ranking for it.

I suggest working with the following news wire outlets:

2. Exact Match Domains With a Ratings Widget Installed

Buy exact match domains and install a ratings widget on them. Then recruit positive reviews and moderate them to show a 5 star rating in Google. Consumers will see this and automatically trust your 5 star service!

NOTE: Build links back to these sites, don’t buy links. Great ways to build links is via guest posts, press releases, and social media bookmarking.

3. Free Blog Sites

Deploy a number of free blog sites targeting the keyword that represents your offer. Here are some of my copy tricks when I rank blogs.

Here’s a list of 10 top notch free blog sites I target:

Finch: Some good ideas here. And particularly useful for those who have digital products and don’t want the first page of the SERP being dedicated to illegal downloads of their shit.

Recommended This Week

  • Be sure to check out the Direct Response blog for a lot more from Rich. I like his posts. They’re just as angry as mine.

  • Head over to Finch Premiums for the chance to save big on Volumes 1-4 of Premium Posts. Sale ends shortly when Volume 5 is released.

www.ewanetwork.com

AuthorRank: Should Affiliates Be Worried?

So, I’m guessing you’ve heard about AuthorRank?

It’s the latest Google brainfart. And it’s doing the rounds on practically every content marketing blog in my reader.

Here’s an explanation of what AuthorRank does, straight from the horse’s mouth:

The identity of individual agents responsible for content can be used to influence search ratings. Assuming that a given agent has a high reputational score, representing an established reputation for authoring valuable content, then additional content authored and signed by that agent will be promoted relative to unsigned content or content from less reputable agents in search results.
- taken from Google’s patent

Skyrocket SEO did a fantastic job of summing up what AuthorRank could mean for content marketers.

Eric Nagel also wrote an interesting post from an affiliate perspective.

‘Changes to Google’ and ‘impact on affiliates’ are two phrases that we’ve grown used to interpreting in a negative light over the last few years.

So forgive me for asking what immediately springs to mind…

What is AuthorRank’s potential to mess with my shit?

As a concept, I actually quite like AuthorRank.

I like the idea of writers being able to lend credibility to their content through reputation alone. Yet affiliates have a somewhat mixed agenda…

Essentially, by using the rel=author tag, I could send a signal to Google that the person who writes this blog is the same dude that cranks out posts related to weight loss, dating, Justin Bieber and whatever other scumbag projects I might or might not be working on at the time.

That signal could be translated in to my gleaming face, and my social profile, sitting next to those links in the SERP.

Now, the dilemma for myself and many other readers, is do I really want the world and its dog to be able to see what I’m working on? Do I want my name attached to niche exploitation where my true expertise is little to none?

It’s a tough one. Our industry is still somewhat obscured by a veil of secrecy.

Affiliates rarely like to talk about their works-in-progress. If somebody comes along with a bigger budget and blows them out of the water, well, you get it. That’s bad business.

Many of us invest in private domain registrations, multiple servers and a crap load of pseudonyms to hide our footprint.

Personally, I feel that if a site requires the absolute top level of secrecy, it’s probably a good indication that I’m engaging in some murky shit that isn’t compatible with my long-term business objectives. Or that it’s porn. I try not to get too paranoid about people spying on my projects.

In reality, as long as you keep executing, you will stay ahead of those who keep chasing tails.

That said, I believe it’s important to lend an identity to every website I launch. It might not be run by ‘Finch’, but it has to have a name attached to build some vital bridges of trust. I’m a big fan of pseudonyms, and so AuthorRank is likely to require a new level of thinking.

Whereas in the past, I could get away with a pseudonym and a fake profile, I can see it becoming necessary to embrace those fake identities on a social level. Perhaps building author reputation will become as important as traditional backlink development.

I can’t imagine a situation where I would want to lend my real name to every affiliate project I work on. There are products I promote, and verticals I work in, that I certainly don’t wish to come back and haunt me over a dining table in the future.

However, if AuthorRank takes off in a big way – as many suspect it will – I would definitely look to exploit my existing assets by placing my name on new projects where I can justify an involvement.

This is one of the rare few Google developments that I see as a great opportunity for content creators. For those of us involved with affiliate sites, however, I see a lot of profile juggling ahead. Could it be time to think of a pseudonym for every niche you work in?

Okay, that’s probably a little extreme. But it will be interesting to see how Google evolves with this change.

Will you be making any preparations or changes for AuthorRank?

Recommended This Week

www.ewanetwork.com

CPA Marketers: Read This And Improve Your Conversion Rates

The line between profitability and hopelessness has become so thin that you are royally shooting yourself in the balls if you are not fighting for every last conversion.

A common problem I see with affiliate sales funnels is a lack of understanding for what constitutes a conversion. Sounds pretty obvious, right? “Duh Finch, I get money when another sucker joins True.” Well, that’s almost correct. Unfortunately, the ‘almost’ cripples many campaigns.

Before promoting any offer, you must take the time to research exactly when the conversion pixel fires. There’s no room for vague assumptions. “Joining True” paints a picture in my mind of the conversion pixel being fired as soon as the user selects a username and hits Next. Most of the time, this is not the case.

We have zip submits, single opt-ins (SOI), double opt-ins (DOI), questionnaires to answer, profile pictures to upload, applications to download, first orders to place… every offer comes with its own criteria for when the conversion should be fired.

The definition of “joining a site” is black and white. But your conversion isn’t. Don’t make the mistake of assuming they are one and the same.

Here are some general guidelines for how your landing pages can be adapted to suit each conversion type.

Zip submits

Generally seen as the easiest affiliate offers to promote, zip submits do exactly what they say on the tin. As soon as the user submits his zip-code, you get your conversion. The payouts on these offers are predictably low to offset the unpredictability of the traffic quality.

The golden rule of promoting zip submits is to hold the advertiser’s hand and give them exactly what they want. There’s no point in delivering poor quality traffic. You’ll be scrubbed to Timbuktu in no time.

Single opt-ins

A single opt-in requires the user to submit his email address. However, the conversion is triggered after the submission rather than at the point of confirmation. You’ll find a lot of single opt-in offers paying around $2-$3.50. It’s not big bucks, but it’s better than a zip submit.

In my opinion, the large majority of affiliates use landing pages that are aimed at achieving a single opt-in. It’s the standard entry point. But think about it logically. If the advertiser is paying out on a single opt-in, you can probably increase your traffic quality substantially simply by treating the offer like a double opt-in. Encourage and incentivize the user to confirm his email address. This may have to come at the price of one of our favourite affiliate tactics: completely bullshitting the real nature of the offer. “Hey, where all the single soldiers at?

Double opt-ins

A confirmed double opt-in is worth infinitely more than a single opt-in. Your payouts will traditionally reflect this by offering double for the confirmed email.

Something to keep in mind with double opt-in campaigns, particularly in the dating vertical, is that it makes no sense to calculate ROI on an ongoing ‘live’ basis. A small but significant percentage of users will not confirm their double opt-in straight away. They will get busy, distracted, or otherwise torn away from their Gmail. This can lead to a small trickle of conversions being fired the next morning. Ever had 0 clicks and 3 conversions? Well, there you go.

However, if you’re monitoring your stats like a hawk, what are you going to think when you finish the evening taking a loss? You’ve probably already deleted the campaign by then.

Always let your conversions filter through before making any snap judgments.

Survey/questionnaire completion

Some offers require the completion of an entire questionnaire before the conversion is recorded. Now imagine you’re the stereotypical battering-ram of a publisher who cares not for such details. You design a landing page with a teasing call-to-action like this:

Register in 45 Seconds or Less!

Sounds nice and coaxing, right? In some cases this works as a great hook. But it’s a terrible call-to-action when the conversion pixel is only fired after a 15 minute questionnaire.

I see it happening time and time again. Affiliates go for quick dealmakers. They sell every offer with the brevity of a single opt-in, when they should actually be shooting for a solid incentive to complete Steps A, B and C.

In instances where the user is required to navigate his way through a complex 15 minute interrogation, your landing page has a duty to sell this process and make it seem worthwhile. How could you get a user to answer a questionnaire?

To give you an example, on dating sites, I use it to filter out the ‘bad dates’ that the user will be avoiding when she joins the new service. It’s quality protection, because she only deserves the best.

Profile photo upload

This is another common requirement on high-payout dating offers.

Offers that convert only after a profile photo upload would have worried the crap out of me 5 years ago. But now thanks to Facebook, even technophobic 75 year old grandmas have photos at their disposal.

The secret to nailing these conversions is to make a direct reference to the benefits of uploading a photo. If you’re branding the site as an unusual paradise where men actually receive messages from hot girls, you should make it clear that communications increase X% when the user adds his photo. Or say that members without a photo are being culled and will not qualify for the free trial offer. Whatever puts the thought in his head and safeguards your conversion.

Converts on download

There are many toolbar and gaming offers out there where the user is expected not only to sign up, but to download and sometimes even play the game for the first time.

For single opt-in minded folk, I like to call this the ‘minefield offer’.

It’s littered with so many what-ifs that the challenge is as much about hitting the right carefree demographic as it is selling the product. A golden rule that I’ve adopted is to avoid targeting users who are likely to be on their work computers. This crowd does not want to download and leave a trace. So you will need to day-part and keep a tight hold over your demographics.

There’s no point in trying to con the user here. Your best step forward is to sell the offer as a legitimate must-have and hope that the user’s interest is perked enough to follow the necessary steps.

For gaming offers, “Can you beat this ridiculous score?” is a winning hook.

So, how are your conversions today?

Take a look at your own sales funnels. Be honest.

Has it all gone slightly tits-up?

Your landing page must not only sell the offer. It must sell the required steps necessary to secure the conversion.

As I said on StackThatMoney this week, your sales funnel has to be designed to shove the user to the conversion pixel, NOT purely to get them to choose a username and press Next. Be clear with your objectives!

Recommended This Week

www.ewanetwork.com

Powered by WordPress | Designed by: SharePoint Site | Thanks to Virtual Server, Email Hosting and Rent Server